|
|
During the campaign for president, there has been considerable talk about the “American dream,” a concept that is often difficult to articulate in concrete terms. With the election mere days away, now is the time for the voters to decide which candidate’s vision for America’s future best matches their own definition of that dream.
Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama has promised “change” so that Americans would no longer have to dream about those things that an American society should provide for all citizens. In an Obama administration, Americans would have affordable health care. The specter of hardworking Americans going bankrupt because of unmanageable medical costs would disappear.
For conservatives, the “American dream” consists of the freedom to acquire property without the interference of government regulations and tax rates so low that their wealth isn’t seriously diminished. Unfortunately, government programs for the working class cannot be financed without adequate tax revenues. The response of the conservatives is to advocate for small government and the elimination of projects for those in need.
Obama has touched a chord of national solidarity among Americans. Deep in the nation’s soul, there seems to be a desire to end ethnic and economic divisions and become one nation. Throughout the campaign, Obama has shown the judgment and the executive ability to be an effective president. His Republican opponent, John McCain, seems to be intemperate, indecisive and an advocate of policies that aid the rich. By now, it should be clear that the interests of working-class and middle-class Americans will be best served by Barack Obama as president.
Sen. John Kerry has earned the community’s support. His early endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential bid required real political courage. It is unusual for a U.S. senator to make such an endorsement in a presidential primary, and it was especially hazardous politically since Sen. Hillary Clinton had such strong support among Kerry’s constituents. Kerry went on to become an effective surrogate for Obama in the early months of the presidential campaign.
That would be enough to warrant support of Kerry, but he has also earned a 100 percent “A” rating from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People for his advocacy of increasing federal student aid and increasing the minimum wage. The community should remember on Election Day that it has a friend in John Kerry.
Dianne Wilkerson has been the most productive holder of the Second Suffolk District’s seat in the state Senate since its establishment in 1972. She brought intellectual acuity and the skills of an accomplished lawyer to the office.
Her many achievements include extending the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act to insurance companies, requiring police departments to provide racial data in an effort to combat so-called “driving while black” harassment, providing funds for witness protection to counter the “stop snitching” code, and authoring laws designed to prevent insurance redlining and predatory lending practices.
The Bay State Banner has always endorsed Wilkerson’s achievements, even though her administrative irregularities were troubling. She failed to file tax returns for several years and she violated state campaign finance laws on multiple occasions. The Banner viewed these charges as unfortunate blemishes on an otherwise productive career.
But now, Wilkerson has been arrested by the FBI and Boston police, and stands charged with the felony of extorting payment from constituents for official services. The photographic evidence in support of these charges is compelling; investigators also claim to have audio and video recordings of Wilkerson’s misdeeds. It is evident that Wilkerson has breached the public trust. Consequently, the Banner can no longer support Wilkerson for public office.
| Dec 16 16:46pm by maleneundersolen@yahoo.dk [72.72.98.49] | |
Whether or not Wilkerson took bribes, it is a national pattern that black elected officials and constituency leaders of especially lower income constituents are being targeted for similar operations. This come in the wake of the greates economic crisis we have ever faced, where the policy by the financial interests in Wall Street, London, Boston and other financial centers is to make the population pay. The budget cuts and the bailout pakages are only the beginning, and those elected officials who would be the once to fight against this intended fascist austerity are being taken out with methods known as the Operation Frühmenschen by the FBI - a rascist program which has been alive and well since the 1950's but which can be defeated with real American methods. http://larouchepac.com/news/2008/12/12/lpactv-report-operation-fruehmenschen.html
|
|
| Nov 1 21:17pm by Cosmo [99.205.2.167] | |
Good Luck Senator Wilkerson. I was never a big fan of yours, but I do recognize the hurdles that you had to go through for your legislative successes. I just believe that there are other residents in your district who are as, if not, more qualified to legislatively represent the residents of Roxbury, Chinatown and the Back Bay. |
|
| Oct 31 0:59am by a disgruntled reader [63.164.145.85] | |
Shame on this paper for supporting Wilkerson all these years. I thought it was the responsibility of the black media to provide fair and balanced information that is in the best interest of its readership, which includes reporting about the good and bad of black newsmakers. I always wondered why your news on Diane was always biased towards her, but we all know why now. I hope in the future the Banner will hold all black people more accountable for their misdeeds. |
|
| Oct 30 0:02am by Carlos Saavedra [151.199.58.44] | |
Everyone should have know that Sen. Wilkerson was a ticking bomb, including the Bay State Banner. Insteadl, the Banner went into the tank with Senator Wilkerson throwing away any issue that had to deal with her questionable ethics, all in the name of political power. Now you find yourself in the unique position of having to swallow your tongue. You should be ashame of yourself. There is a solution for term limits when it comes to politician the like of Wilkerson, its called the FBI. You guys are disgraceful. |
|
| Oct 29 14:11pm by DW Constituant [171.159.192.10] | |
Good editorial regarding Senator Wilkerson. One of the things that worries me most about the indictment papers is that the investiation was prompted by a claim that she had long been taking cash for favors. To me, this means there were a lot of bribers that fed her habit before these recent allegations. I'd also like to see some information regarding the Senators who came before her. On the radio today, I heard that she's the 3rd in a row to be charged/convicted. Perhaps she learned from her elders? |
|