Bill raises mandatory school attendance age to 18

Araba Adoboe, a 17-year-old from Amherst, speaks at a State House press conference March 8 about why she dropped out of high school. State Sen. Sonia Chang-Diaz (2nd from left) is the lead sponsor of a bill aimed at reducing the school dropout rate. (Sandra Larson photo)

Preventive action with monitoring and support

Sandra Larson

The Massachusetts legislature’s Joint Committee on Education voted favorably last week on a bill to reduce the school dropout rate in Massachusetts with a variety of prevention and recovery measures.

Senate Bill 185, “An Act Relative to Dropout Prevention and Recovery,” raises the mandatory school attendance age from 16 to 18. In addition, it includes measures to identify dropout risk early, prevent students from quitting school and bring them back into the system quickly if they do drop out.

Sen. Sonia Chang-Diaz (D-Boston), the senate chair of the Education Committee and lead sponsor of the bill, held a press conference at the State House following last week’s vote.

“Massachusetts is the birthplace of public education,” she said. “We know how to do things right. But we are not reaching every student. The best way to keep students on track is a comprehensive plan to get at the root causes of dropout.”

Each year, some 8,000 Massachusetts high school students drop out, according to reports from the state’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). While the annual dropout rate has actually declined over the past several years, from 3.8 percent in 2006-07 to 2.7 percent in 2010-11, Hispanic and black students continue to top the chart for dropout rates among individual racial and ethnic categories.

In Boston, the annual dropout number has been around 1,200 in recent years, down from 1,800 in 2004, said Kathy Hamilton, youth transitions director at the Boston Private Industry Council (PIC).  

The PIC’s Youth Transitions Task Force was convened in 2004 by Mayor Thomas Menino to study and remediate the city’s dropout rate. Hamilton attributed the decrease in dropouts to improved outreach and early intervention, better use of data, provision of alternative pathways to a diploma and a collaborative approach among schools and agencies.

Under the state bill, a new network of graduation coaches would connect at-risk students in grades 7-12 with academic support and community resources, and assist recent dropouts in returning to school. Alternative education services would be provided to expelled or suspended students, and schools would hold workshops each year for parents on effective strategies for engaging their at-risk children.

Araba Adoboe, 17, from Amherst, spoke about how she dropped out of high school after becoming ill with mononucleosis and falling behind in her sophomore year.

“If Senate Bill 185 had been in place then, things would have been different,” Adoboe said. “If I had a graduation coach, maybe I could have received tutoring, or changed schools. Maybe someone would have returned our phone calls.”

The bill also requires districts to report data on students in grades K-12 as part of the Early Warning Indicator System currently under development by the state’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE).

Dr. Andrew Sum, professor of economics and director of the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University, provided stark statistics on the financial toll high school dropout takes on both the student and on the economy.

According to Sum, male high school dropouts will have lifetime earnings of $600,000 less than high school graduates; for female dropouts, the difference is $400,000. Over their lifetime, from ages 18 to 74, high school dropouts will pay half a million dollars less in taxes, on average, and will require more in government expenditures than high school graduates.

“So it’s less income for them and more cost to the rest of us,” he said.

Responding to questions about the bill’s funding, Chang-Diaz explained that the cost of the graduation coach program will be borne by the state, not cities; and funds already in place for standard and alternative education could be tapped for the costs of additional students staying in school or receiving alternative services during long term suspension, she said.

She cited the high return on investment for a bill that could help would-be dropouts become productive members of the labor force and stay out of jail. High school dropouts make up 70 percent of the state’s jail and prison population, she noted, at an average cost of $46,000 per inmate per year — while a year of public education costs about $11,000.

“I want to push back on the notion that this is a net cost bill,” she said.

Regarding the change in mandatory attendance age, it would be phased in, she said, moving from 16 to 17 in fall of 2013, and to 18 in fall 2014.

“There has been a debate [over the years] about how effective it is to raise the age if you’re not going to do the other supports around it,” Chang-Diaz added — but she said this bill contains the proper measures to make it work. “We’re not just going to say, ‘Your bottoms have to be in the chairs for two more years, but we’re not going to change anything about your level of engagement.’ ”

The bill now goes to the Senate Committee on Ways and Means for a cost analysis.