Close
Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
BECOME A MEMBER
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
BACK TO TOP
The Bay State Banner
POST AN AD SIGN IN

Trending Articles

Roxbury condos $500k and up

Roxbury celebrates cultural district designation this month

Democrats face push from left

READ PRINT EDITION

The countdown to Armageddon

baystatebanner

The countdown to Armageddon

The countdown to a war between Israel and Iran has begun.

Tehran recently announced that it test-fired long-range missiles capable of striking Israel, Egypt, Europe and American bases in the Persian Gulf. “Iran has successfully test-fired medium-range Shahab missiles with multiple warheads,” the country’s state-run media reported, adding that the launch was designed to “boost the armed forces’ deterrent capabilities.”

The test fire came on the eve of Yom Kippur and just two days after the White House disclosed that Iran had developed a new uranium enrichment facility — the first step to developing an atomic bomb. Current intelligence reports estimate that Iran could enrich enough fissile material to develop a nuclear warhead within one to three years.

Tehran insists that its program is strictly for civilian energy production. This is laughable. Iran has one of the largest natural gas reserves in the world. The idea that it would risk a path of global destabilization in order to develop an energy source more costly than its gas-fueled plants is preposterous.

Tehran’s program is clearly aimed at developing a nuclear bomb. Even French President Nicolas Sarkozy has publicly stated that “Iran is working on a nuclear [weapons] program.”

Israel, which is known as a single-bomb state because it would take one bomb to wipe it off the map, cannot let that happen. Iran is already one of the foremost sponsors of terrorism in the world. If Iran achieves nuclear capability, it will undoubtedly step up its support to terrorist regimes. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad consistently refers to Israel as a cancerous tumor and has previously pledged to wipe Israel off the map. If Iran achieves nuclear capacity, it will likely give a bomb to Syria, and perhaps even Hezbollah.

The idea of a nuclear Iran funneling weapons to groups that openly seek to bring about a cataclysm is terrifying. Hezbollah would not hesitate to attack the U.S. or one of its allies. Even if such groups are unable to launch a direct attack on the U.S., they could target Saudi oil reserves and effectively bring this country — and the global economy — to a halt.

Moreover, Iranian development of a nuclear bomb would almost certainly kick-start a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, further destabilizing the region. Nuclear proliferation throughout a region infested with radical religious doctrines, diminished economic possibilities and an unyielding belief in the afterlife is a recipe for cataclysm. The U.S. must make it clear that it will respond with devastating force if Iran continues its rogue nuclear program.

But even the threat of force may not be enough to deter Iran, which seems convinced that the U.S. — fatigued from war in Iraq and Afghanistan — will not attack them. The mullahs know that the U.N. is impotent. Though President Obama has responded with threats of severe sanctions if Iran continues its enrichment program, such sanctions are essentially meaningless without the support of Russia and China — both of whom clearly enjoy the problems that Iran is causing America and Europe. Saber-rattling aside, Tehran has no real reason to feel immediately threatened by the U.S.

The wild card in all of this is Israel. If upcoming peace talks between the U.S. and Tehran are unsuccessful, Israel will almost certainly declare war on Iran. Stage one would involve air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. However, since many of these facilities are underground, it is possible that Israel would be unable to completely disable Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. In response, Iran will launch short-range missiles from Lebanon. At which point, Israel will have to decide whether to wipe Iran off the map will a full-fledged nuclear attack.

The clearest way to avoid this scenario might be for Obama to set a hard timetable for Iran to abandon its program. However appealing the idea of diplomatic talks, the reality is that Iran views the U.S. as an evil empire. Making concessions to the U.S. would be tantamount to political suicide for Ahmadinejad. He would lose all credibility in the Muslim world. This is why Obama must make it clear that he will not allow Iran to buy time through talks. The more time we give Iran, the more successful it will be at hiding underground enrichment facilities and securing its nuclear program. Diplomacy must be imbued with the credible threat of force. The U.S. must declare that it will employ devastating force to prevent a nuclear Iran.

The U.S. should provide Israel with the “bunker-busting” bombs necessary to destroy Iran’s underground enrichment facilities. At the same time, the U.S. must lead an international coalition to combat Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. That coalition must not only impose economic sanctions, it must focus military and intelligence efforts in the region, including the sale of anti-ballistic missiles to Gulf states. Finally, the U.S. must publicly proclaim that it will support Israel’s right to protect itself through preemptive attacks.

In short, the U.S. must make it clear that Tehran’s nuclear brinkmanship threatens not just Ahmadinejad’s political survival, but also the survival of the Iranian republic. Taking a hard stand will be unpopular. It will take an immense commitment at a time where U.S. military resources are already severely depleted. But treating Iran with kid gloves will only precipitate Iran’s march toward nuclear capacity — and World War III.

Armstrong Williams is a political commentator and the host of the nightly XM Satellite Radio program “The Armstrong Williams Show.”