Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
The Bay State Banner

Trending Articles

Group helps women enter building trades

Whittier employees fired in advance of union vote

An idealistic challenger takes on a pragmatic incumbent in J.P./Mission Hill district


Study: Gaps in wealth grew during recession


Black and low-income households have been hit hardest by the recession, widening the gap between rich and poor, claims a new study by the Economic Policy Institute.

According to the non-partisan, nonprofit think tank, the recession officially lasted from December 2007 through June 2009. By the end of this time, the median net worth of black households was just $2,200 — the lowest ever recorded. Meanwhile, the median net worth of white households was $97,900 — 44.5 times the net worth of black households.

Almost a quarter of households in the United States had a zero or negative net worth in 2009, a sharp increase from 18.6 percent before the recession. But the number of black households with zero or negative net worth was a staggering 40 percent.

The Economic Policy Institute defines net worth, also referred to as wealth, as the sum of all assets less the sum of all liabilities. Assets include money in the bank, real estate, stock, retirement funds and retirement plans, while liabilities include mortgages, credit card debt, student loans and outstanding medical bills. Social Security and Medicare are excluded from net worth calculations because workers do not legally own these assets.

Most middle-class families in the United States rely on their homes as their primary source of wealth, the study explained. But after the burst of the housing bubble in 2006, equity and house prices dramatically fell, ruining the wealth of millions of households.

But the recession hit Americans unevenly, the study shows. The richest fifth of the country witnessed a 16 percent decline in household wealth, while the remaining four-fifths of Americans experienced a 25 percent drop. For black households, this decline in wealth was even more dramatic — 37 percent.

According to the report, this unevenness can be traced to where a family holds its assets. “Wealthy households, for example, tend to hold a much higher percentage of their wealth in stocks and bonds,” the study explains, “whereas less-affluent households typically hold most of their wealth in housing equity — which is why the recent troubles in housing have disproportionately affected the middle class.”

At the same time, the top fifth’s share of wealth increased at the expense of the bottom four-fifths. In 2009, the top fifth held a staggering 87.2 percent of the country’s wealth, an increase of 2.2 percent, while the bottom four-fifths owned just 12.8 percent, a decrease of the same amount.

This gap between rich and poor has “not only persisted, but has grown over time,” the report demonstrates. In 1962, the richest fifth in America controlled 81 percent of the country’s wealth, and the remaining four-fifths controlled just 19 percent. After two decades, this gap widened to 81.3 percent and 18.7 percent, and by 1998, it stood at 83.4 percent and 16.6 percent. Today, the distance is even further. More striking is the disparity in actual dollars. In 1962, the richest fifth had an average of $773,000 in wealth, while the bottom fifth on average was $7,000 in debt. By 1998, the average wealth of the top fifth grew to $1,338,400, while that of the bottom fifth sank to $11,700 in debt.

In 2009, the official end of the recession, the average net worth of the top fifth was $1,711,500. This amount represents a considerable decline from 2007, when the average wealth was  more than $2 million, but the bottom fifth dropped much more. By 2009, the bottom fifth was on average $27,200 in debt.

“Despite the recent loss of wealth for the top, the wealth of the richest one percent of American households has increased by half since 1983,” said Sylvia Allegretto, report author and Economic Policy Institute research associate. “The bottom 60 percent, on the other hand, is worse off.”

Although the report does not delve into the recovery, which began in 2009, it suggests that disparities are inherent in it as well. “The recovery since then has proceeded on two tracks,” it says, “one for typical families and workers, who continue to struggle against high rates of unemployment and continued foreclosures, and another track for the investor class and the wealthy, who have enjoyed significant gains in the stock market and benefited from record corporate profits.

 “The Main Street-Wall Street divide remains as big as ever in the aftermath.”

“The State of Working America’s Wealth, 2011” by Sylvia Allegretto is part of the Economic Policy Institute’s “State of Working America” series and can be accessed at