Close
Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
BECOME A MEMBER
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
BACK TO TOP
The Bay State Banner
POST AN AD SIGN IN

Trending Articles

No longer in the gang database, yet forever marked a gangster

Candidates face off in JP Progressives debate

Cirque du Soleil’s 'Luzia' is a stunning tribute to Mexico

READ PRINT EDITION

Bill aims for equity in access to solar

Financial incentives for solar energy less available to low-income communities

Jule Pattison-Gordon
Bill aims for equity in access to solar
Members of the Black and Latino Caucus and Green Justice Coalition supporting the legislation turn out for a State House briefing. Left to right: State Rep. Russell Holmes, Sen. Linda Dorcena Forry, Rep. Aaron Vega, Rep. Carlos Gonzalez, Rep. Bud Williams, Rev. Mariama White-Hammond, Rep. Frank Moran, Neighbor to Neighbor Climate Justice Field Coordinator Andrea Nyameke, Clean Water Action Campaign Organizer Joel Wool and Community Labor United Director of Organizing Khalida Smalls.

Black and Latino lawmakers have teamed up with environmental advocates to tackle a piece of 2016 legislation that they say created a barrier for on low-income renters who seek cheaper, cleaner energy. To fix this, the Black and Latino Legislative Caucus and the Green Justice Coalition are pushing for solar equity bills. The senate version of the bill is sponsored by Sen. Sonia Chang-Diaz, the house version by Rep. Russell Holmes and Rep. Michelle DuBois.

Solar incentives

In 2016, the state Legislature passed a compromise law, attempting to balance the needs of utility companies with the needs of solar advocates. Many solar projects rely on incentives to offset start-up costs or make the switch to solar appealing. One piece of this is a policy known as “Solar Renewable Energy Credits” or “SREC,” under which those who produce their own renewable energy can receive payment from the utility company in exchange for the company counting the green energy the consumers produced as their own. Under “net metering,” customers who produce renewable energy get a credit off their energy bill if they produce more than they use.

But there is a cap on how many large-scale projects utility companies will reimburse — and that cap was reached in 2015. As such, many groups were due to lose a major financial incentive for installing solar panels, which sent legislators back to the drawing board.

The new April 2016 law raised the cap, but at the same time reduced the reimbursement rate for many projects by 40 percent. Exemptions were granted, letting government-owned projects and small residential projects keep the original reimbursement rate. But those who saw their compensation drop include community projects and renters who aimed to buy into a system and receive renewable energy they did not personally produce.

Unintended damages

That legislative policy change nearly killed an attempt by three churches in Dorchester, the South End and Jamaica Plain to team up and generate solar energy for local residents. Five years ago, leaders of churches that are near high-poverty level census tracts came together and created a plan to make use of their large roofs to generate renewable energy, and then provide the surplus to the community for a low price.

“We have the space that some do not,” said Pastor Victor Price of Second Church in Dorchester. “Such a large roof that can produce so much, yet so many in our community are unable to meet their monthly payments for electricity.”

But by the time the church leaders were at the point of installing solar panels, policy around it changed, threatening its economic viability. Church leaders could no longer afford to fully cover the roofs, due both to a reduction to the net metering incentives and to rules around what type of electricity hookup could be used, said Rev. Mariama White-Hammond of Bethel AME Church. The scale-back reduced energy production to one-half or one-third of the original plan.

“Originally we thought we would be able to give 50 percent of the energy away,” she said.

Racial-environmental collaboration

Low-income and otherwise marginalized communities and environmentalism are intertwined, said several speakers at an information session for the new solar bills. In part, that is because those communities often are especially vulnerable to impacts of environmental issues such as climate change and extreme weather, said Sen. Sonia Chang-Diaz.

Additionally, low-income communities could benefit most from more affordable energy — something that renewable, environmentally-friendly energy generation offers, said White-Hammond. Yet often low-income residents are blocked due to financial reasons, reasons such as credit score requirements or due to the 2016 cut to financial support that otherwise could help offset initial costs of setting up a solar energy producing system. She noted that the new solar legislation is the first environmental bill to be sponsored by the Black and Latino Caucus, that that she hopes it leads to more collaboration.

Price said that too often, his community is left out, including from getting information on environmental projects and solar energy incentives. Maria Fortes, an organizer with the Coalition of Social Justice, said that during outreach to Spanish- and Cape Verdean-speaking immigrants on the South Shore, she found many are interested in renewable energy but blocked by lack of materials supplied in their languages.

The changes to financial support made in the 2016 energy legislation also may reflect who has political power. Isaac Baker, co-president of Resident Energy, said he believes municipalities and those who represent homeowners had the lobbying clout that low-income communities lacked, and therefore were able to secure exemptions from the reimbursement cut.

“Low-income communities did not get that benefit because they did not have the same presence around the table,” Baker said.

Sen. Jamie Eldridge agreed that those without strong political or lobbying presence at the State House appeared to have lost out, and he called the 2016 bill embarrassing.

“We’re all paying into these incentives in our electric bills, yet more often than not, middle-income communities — communities in my district — are benefitting more than low-income communities of color,” he said.

The bills

The proposed bills would provide low- and moderate-income residents and renters with similar compensation rates to homeowners when they buy into solar projects in low- to moderate-income communities and communities in which at least a quarter of the population is minority or lacks English language proficiency. Any future solar incentive compensation program would be required to have an equity component as well.

Sen. Chang-Diaz says the bills are among several pieces of legislation targeted at giving agency and protection to low-income communities in the face of climate change.

Ben Underwood, Resident Energy co-president, said the House and Senate bill would make significant difference.

“This bill would make it possible to do those larger projects moving forward,” Underwood said.

A legislative hearing on solar energy will be held on October 3.

Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner