Close
Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
BECOME A MEMBER
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
BACK TO TOP
The Bay State Banner
POST AN AD SIGN IN

Trending Articles

Forced busing or court-ordered desegregation? Why Bostonians don't see eye-to-eye

Is there a double standard in how the Boston Police Department disciplines cops?

For sale: 2 acres in Dudley Square

READ PRINT EDITION

Dot Block project raises displacement concerns

Building trades voice support, abutters are divided

Yawu Miller
Yawu Miller
Yawu Miller is the Banner’s senior editor. VIEW BIO
Dot Block project raises displacement concerns
Mimi Ramos and other members of the group Dorchester Not For Sale spoke out against plans for a 488-unit development near Fields Corner. BANNER PHOTO

Developers of one of the largest residential complexes planned for Dorchester squared off against affordable housing activists at a meeting Monday, defending the Dot Block project against charges that it will drive up rents in the area and force longtime residents out of the city.

The back-and-forth between supporters and opponents of the project got testy at times, with members of the group Dorchester Not For Sale predicting displacement and some abutters complaining about traffic, while representatives of nearby neighborhood groups and building trade union members spoke in favor.

“This is not for us,” said Mimi Ramos, who wore a blue T-shirt with the words “We are Dorchester” written in English, Spanish, Cape Verdean Kriolu and Vietnamese. “You are basically telling the community that you don’t want us here.”

The development project, which sits on land bordered by Dorchester Avenue, Hancock Street, Pleasant Street and Greenmount Street, received approval from the Boston Planning and Development board in 2016 for 362 units of housing, a five-story parking garage and 37,000 square feet of retail.

More units

In January, developer Wintergold LLC and Samuels & Associates filed for a project change that would increase the number of units to 488, relocate the parking under the buildings and reduce the commercial space to 23,000 square feet. Included in the new figure are 66 affordable units — half a percentage point over the city’s minimum requirement of 13 percent of the total.

Menzin noted that three of the units would be affordable to families earning up to 45 percent of the Area Median Income, 12 would be available to families earning up to 50 percent and 10 to families earning up to 63 percent. He added that the affordability for those units is deeper than the 70 percent AMI required by the city’s Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP).

“We’ve heard that traditional affordable housing units don’t work for people in this neighborhood,” he said.

Menzin also said the 66 proposed affordable units would boost overall affordable numbers for the neighborhood.

“Sixty-six units is about equivalent to what’s been built in Dorchester in the last three years with IDP money,” he said.

Speaking in favor of the development, Michael Keaty told the audience he felt very positive about the project.

“Change is hard,” he said. “There’s a lot of concern and a lot of fear. Just try to be positive, folks”.

Dorchester resident Erica Schwarz praised the project, telling the development team she would want to live there, but raised concerns about affordability.

“What are the proposed rents for the market-rate units?” she asked.

Abe Menzin of Samuels and Associates said the firm has not yet settled on numbers.

“I know you have numbers,” Schwarz pressed. “I work in real estate.”

When Menzin said the units would fetch $4 per square foot, Schwarz shot back.

“So a 1,000 square-foot apartment would be $4,000?”

Menzin said the apartments would not be that large.

Schwarz echoed the concerns of many in the room, questioning whether the developers could make the rents more affordable.

“This is going to kick off another huge wave of displacement,” she said. “This has to be way more affordable.”

Traffic

Others spoke about the project’s impact on traffic, which backs up significantly on Dorchester Avenue during the afternoon.

Local business owner Stuart Schrier questioned the traffic impact of the project, noting that the developers’ decision not to include a supermarket would induce residents of the 488 units to shop elsewhere.

“Four hundred eighty-eight families are going to be leaving the site to drive down to Morrissey Boulevard,” he said. “We can’t take that traffic.”

Affordable housing activists also complained that the meeting had no translation services and asked BPDA officials present to schedule another. BPDA planner Aisling Kerr did not commit to holding another meeting.

The public comment period for the review of the Dot Block project ends on Friday, March 1. Comments can be submitted on the BPDA website: www.bostonplans.org/projects/development-projects/dot-block

Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner