Close
Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
BECOME A MEMBER
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
BACK TO TOP
The Bay State Banner
POST AN AD SIGN IN

Trending Articles

‘Chief problem solver’ aims to make medical tech industry more diverse

James Brown tribute concert packs the Strand

Franklin Park neighbors divided over Shattuck redevelopment project

READ PRINT EDITION

Councilors vying for presidency

Two main factions appear to divide body as contenders aim for 7 votes

Yawu Miller
Yawu Miller is the former senior editor of the Bay State Banner. He has written for the Banner since 1988.... VIEW BIO
Councilors vying for presidency
Kim Janey, Matt O'Malley, Lydia Edwards. BANNER PHOTOS

Before the dust settled on the Nov. 5 election, Boston City Council members were busily working on the first agenda item for the coming year: who the next council president will be.

After three weeks of wrangling, the body appears split largely along race lines, with a majority of the white councilors backing District 6 Councilor Matt O’Malley and mostly black and Latino members backing District 7 Councilor Kim Janey and District 1 Councilor Lydia Edwards. The latter two say they support each other, and each is willing to bow out if the other gets to the seven votes needed to seal the presidency.

“I don’t see Kim as anything other than a friend,” Edwards said. “If she grows, I grow.”

Janey and Edwards claim six votes in their coalition of supporters.

O’Malley, who at 40 is the longest-continuously-serving member of the body, also says he has six votes.

“I’ve been approached by several colleagues who think that my experience and vision and temperament would be good,” he told the Banner. “I’m confident that we’ll be figure this out. It’s obviously a little early.”

Several City Hall sources reached by the Banner said those supporting O’Malley include councilors Frank Baker, Annissa Essaibi-George, Michael Flaherty, Edward Flynn and Andrea Campbell. Of those, only Essaibi-George confirmed she’s supporting O’Malley. The others did not return phone calls for comment.

Councilors typically vote on the presidency during their first meeting in January.

Essaibi-George said O’Malley’s experience as the longest-serving councilor on the body is a plus.

“What I’m excited about and what I think Matt brings to the table is representing the body as a whole with his long-term experience on the council,” she said. “I think the council’s work will continue to be forward-thinking and progressive.”

Voters this year elected four new members, two of whom will be people of color and all four of whom were endorsed by progressive coalitions and groups. For the first time ever, the council will be majority women, and a majority of the members identify as people of color.

Rent control, gang database

Aside from the vote on the council presidency, ideological fault lines could divide the council next year as it grapples with key issues that emerged in forums and debates during the campaign season, such as housing, criminal justice reform and education.

Right To The City Vote Boston, an organization that advocates for the re-imposition of rent control, did not endorse at-large Councilor Michael Flaherty, Essaibi-George, Baker or Campbell.

Asked by the Boston Coalition for Education Equity whether they would support changing the admissions requirements to Boston’s Exam Schools — which currently include the controversial ISEE test — Essaibi-George, Flaherty and O’Malley said they would not. Baker and Campbell did not respond to the group’s survey.

On an ACLU of Massachusetts survey that asked candidates, among other things, whether they would support closing down Boston Police Department’s gang database, which has come under fire for erroneously listing people of color as gang members. Essaibi-George said she would support reforming the database, but not closing it. O’Malley, Baker, Flaherty and Campbell did not answer the ACLU survey.

Karen Chen, a member of the Right to The City Vote Boston, said voters in the city supported more progressive candidates over moderates and have elected the most progressive council in recent history.

“The voters are demanding for the city council to take more progressive stands,” she said. “The Boston voters came out to vote for stronger tenant protections. The voters are asking the city council to play a role to bring back rent control and to regulate the housing market.”

NAACP Boston Branch President Tanisha Sullivan said she is hopeful the council will pick a president who represents the body’s diversity.

“After generations of a council that lacked diversity in its membership and leadership, it is our hope that the next leader of the council will be someone who not only reflects the racial and gender diversity of the city but is also a leader on pressing racial equity issues like housing, economic justice and participatory governing,”  she said.

Who leads the council matters, because the president has the power to decide which colleagues lead which committees and, therefore, who gets to take the lead on the issues such as housing, education and criminal justice.

O’Malley said he would like the body to be “a strong independent voice” that works collaboratively with the mayor.

“I’m excited about this new council and looking forward to working with its new members.”

Edwards said it’s important that the council president work well across difference.

“We can be a white majority or black majority, but if you do not know how to build coalitions, it’s just folks waiting till they get on top and play us-versus-them,” she said.

Elected school committee

Regardless of who is city council president, Boston Coalition for Education Equity member Lisa Green noted, “The new city council will have 10 of 13 members in support of restoring Bostonians’ right to vote for at least some School Committee members.”

Annissa Essaibi-George and District 8 Councilor-elect Kenzie Bok told the coalition they oppose allowing voters to choose school committee members. Essaibi-George favors modifying the current system to allow city councilors to pick four school committee members and the mayor to pick five.

Other councilors and councilors-elect said they favor either a fully elected committee or a hybrid committee with elected and appointed members.