Close
Current temperature in Boston - 62 °
BECOME A MEMBER
Get access to a personalized news feed, our newsletter and exclusive discounts on everything from shows to local restaurants, All for free.
Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner
BACK TO TOP
The Bay State Banner
POST AN AD SIGN IN

Trending Articles

In Boston's neighborhoods an uneven response to the coronavirus epidemic

Local activist provides free meals

No DESE intervention without parent input

READ PRINT EDITION

Why Bernie fears the superdelegates will do him in — again

Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Bernie Sanders railed loud and long in 2016 that the Democratic Party’s system of superdelegates and the superdelegates themselves were stacked against him. He was right. The Democratic Party’s superdelegates, unlike the GOP superdelegates, are not bound by the party rules to vote for the person getting the most delegate votes. They can vote for the person they want.

In 2016, there was never any doubt that this would be Hillary Clinton. Sanders knew it and screamed foul. He knew it because the Dems’ superdelegates are a bunch of senators, governors, congresspersons, Democratic Party elders, big-gun officials and everybody on the Democratic National Committee. There are 775 of them. Together they make up about 15% of the overall number of delegates.

Sanders has a good case against the outsized role of superdelegates. In 1982, Democratic Party officials cooked up the idea of having superdelegates as a fail-safe firewall against the horror, in their eyes, of having what happened in 1972 happen again. That was the year George McGovern got the party to hold lots more primaries, and then rode the crest of the anti-war, civil rights, student protest and populist wave to win them and bag the Democratic presidential nomination. McGovern was thoroughly trounced by Nixon in the general election. Superdelegates would be the guard at the henhouse door to ensure that any future Democratic presidential candidate would have to be properly establishment, credible, presentable and electable in the general election.

Now, with much talk of a possible brokered 2020 convention, Sanders and many others in the party sweat bullets at that prospect. There’s good reason. A brokered convention is simply that one candidate doesn’t have enough delegate votes to bag the nomination on the first ballot and voting goes to a second ballot. The last Democratic brokered convention was in 1952, when Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson didn’t get the nomination on the first go-around. The brokered part comes into play when delegates and party leaders engage in furious back-and-forth horse trading and swapping votes for their pick.

If this happens at the 2020 Democratic convention, the obvious target will be Sanders. Despite rule changes, the superdelegates then would loom large again. Under the new rules, they can vote on the second round of balloting, and the vote of many almost certainly would not be for Sanders. The reason why hasn’t changed one whit since 2016. Centrist Democrats for the most part still quake in fear that a Sanders nomination will virtually hand the White House back to Trump.

Trump and the GOP seem to think so. The nonstop rumors and reports keep swirling that they are salivating at the thought of Sanders as his opponent. Sanders’ Medicare For All, rip of corporate big shots, along with the claims that his radical reforms will cost untold trillions, supposedly are more than enough to make Sanders easy pickings for Trump.

If it comes down to added rounds of balloting, and if Sanders is the delegate leader but has not gotten the majority needed for the nomination outright, then we are back to the superdelegates. Sanders supporters have flatly said that superdelegates would be the ultimate weapon to torpedo his nomination. This would be far more damaging than 2016. Then, Clinton clearly won a majority of regular party delegates through her primary battles with him, and the superdelegate count for her was merely icing on the nomination cake.

That won’t be the case this time around. Sanders will almost certainly be at or near the top in the number of delegates he’ll rack up in the primaries. He’s got too much campaign cash, and a big, loud and vigorous support base for that not to happen. If he is the delegate count leader, and he’s denied the nomination in follow-up rounds of balloting deal-making, it would be a party horror. No amount of shouting about the mortal peril a Trump reelection poses to the country will sway legions of Sanders supporters to hold their proverbial nose and vote for the Democratic party’s alter-ego choice, let alone hit the campaign trail for that ticket absent Sanders.

Let’s hope for the Democrats’ and Sanders’ sake that it never gets to that.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst.

Already a member? Sign in.
The Bay State Banner